Thursday, October 12, 2023

Primedia revives SA's Got Talent for 9th season on SABC in 2024.


by Thinus Ferreira

After seven years off the air, SA's Got Talent is getting revived and is jumping back to the SABC in 2024.

As TVwithThinus reported last month Primedia now confirms that SA's Got Talent is getting a TV berth back on the South African public broadcaster where it ran for two seasons on SABC2 since 2009 before the Rapid Blue-produced show jumped to e.tv for another six seasons, ending in 2017.

The revived 9th season of SA's Got Talent will air on a SABC channel and will now be produced by Anele Mdoda's Rose and Oaks Media production company.

In late September Primedia, at its second PrimeX event held at Montecasino in Johannesburg, announced that it is bringing several retired international formats back to South African television, like SA's Got Talent, as well as Strictly Come Dancing SA which was on SABC3 and moved to M-Net as Dancing with the Stars SA.

Primedia is also reviving The Voice SA which was also on M-Net for a free-to-air audience. 

Primedia also said it plans to take M-Net's Idols which has run out of ratings steam on Mzansi Magic (DStv 161) currently in its 19th and final season there, to the SABC and a free-to-air audience.

The Masked Singer SA on SABC3, also produced by Rose and Oaks Media, has been renewed for a second and a third season, while the revived Deal or No Deal SA currently on SABC1 produced by Homebrew Films is also getting a second season.

It's not clear whether the new season of SA's Got Talent will be on SABC1 or SABC2 although it will very likely return to SABC2 as its former channel home, with the season that will have 14 episodes.

"In less than a year we've come further and achieved more than we ever dared hope - not least winning three major television format commissions from our country's largest broadcaster," says Jan du Plessis, Primedia Studios president, in a statement.

"All three shows have the power to bring joy and improve lives while showcasing African talent and culture with passion and authenticity".


Showmax exits and shutting down in overseas countries.


by Thinus Ferreira

MultiChoice's video streaming service Showmax is exiting from and shutting down in exiting overseas countries leaving expats elsewhere in the world using it distraught since the new Showmax, done with Comcast's NBCUniversal,  will now focus on and only be available in Africa after its upcoming relaunch.

Laura Cooke, Showmax spokesperson, confirmed to TVwithThinus that Showmax is cutting back its service and availability and shutting down Showmax overseas. It follows after complaints from users in countries like New Zealand saying they were suddenly informed they're losing the subscription service.

From December 2023 Showmax will no longer be available outside of Africa, with MultiChoice saying it's a "strategic decision to allow the business to focus specifically on the African market".

MultiChoice is set to relaunch a 2.0 version of Showmax within months, retooled with the help of Comcast's NBCUniversal and Sky in the United Kingdom. 

It's unclear whether an agreement to contract Showmax to just Africa formed part of the negotiations and new partnership agreement with Comcast, or whether MultiChoice decided for itself to decrease its  streamer's international reach which has been scaled back several times since its ambitious launch. 

Since October no new Showmax subscriptions are available for customers outside of Africa and comes after MultiChoice and Showmax also suspended and decided to end its sports-infused Showmax Pro subscriber tier.

Premium sports content like the English Premier League (EPL) will be folded into Showmax 2.0 at launch.

Showmax 2.0 will eventually be available in 44 markets across sub-Saharan Africa the retooled Showmax will initially only launch in South Africa and a few other African countries which have not yet been specified.

A Showmax subscriber and expat South African living in New Zealand said they're "devastated" after getting an email that Showmax is terminating its availability here. 

"We are devastated and can't fathom why Showmax would do this. It couldn't be because it's not financially feasible."

"It's bad since there are a lot of South African programmes on it that we love to watch. There are so many South Africans in New Zealand and South Africa that it's definitely worthwhile for Showmax to keep its service running in these countries. People would have been willing to pay more for its continued existence."


Tuesday, October 10, 2023

Court sides with MultiChoice in 'free-riding' e.tv TV rights fight over 2023 Rugby World Cup.


by Thinus Ferreira

MultiChoice won on Tuesday afternoon after the court tossed eMedia's Openview case against SuperSport over the 2023 Rugby World Cup TV rights that MultiChoice described as "a classic example of free-riding".

The High Court of South Africa's Gauteng division in Johannesburg on Tuesday struck eMedia's urgent application against MultiChoice and SuperSport off the roll, which means that MultiChoice emerged victorious in the latest sports rights TV fight between Randburg and Hyde Park.

The Randburg-based pay-TV operator and the SABC were dragged to court by eMedia for blocking Openview from showing 2023 Rugby World Cup matches seen on SuperSport and SABC2 and for which Openview hasn't paid for.

After the SABC paid R57 million to sublicence 16 of the 2023 Rugby World Cup matches from SuperSport, viewers of SABC2 on Openview get filler content during matches, while viewers of the SABC2 channel carried on DStv and StarSat, as well as on SABC+ see the Rugby World Cup matches.

eMedia and Openview didn't pay for the Rugby World Cup matches and didn't license and pay for any content from the Rugby World Cup organisers.

eMedia also didn't sublicence content from SuperSport but argued that what is shown on any SABC channels should be available, and the same, anywhere, irrespective of the platform the SABC's channels are on. 

In its answering affidavit to eMedia's urgent application before the High Court, Marc Jury, MultiChoice SA CEO, said that Openview now wants to show 2023 Rugby World Cup matches for free "at no cost to itself despite the fact that it could have participated in the process of securing a licence for those rights from World Cup Rugby directly but never did so".

"After SuperSport had acquired the licence from RWCL in Dublin, Ireland, SuperSport entered into a sublicensing agreement with the SABC to allow for Springboks and other matches to be broadcast on the SABC."

"SuperSport and the SABC agreed that the SABC could exploit the rights on its own owed and operated platforms but it would not be permitted to make available the licensed matches on any third party-owned or operated platform," Marc Jury explains.

"This meant that the SABC is not permitted to make the matches available for broadcast on third-party platforms like Openview. eMedia wants to broadcast the matches to their Openview customers without paying a cent to do so".


'Classic example of free-riding'
Marc Jury argued that eMedia and Openview "were well within their rights to engage in the competitive process to acquire a licence from World Rugby to broadcast the Rugby World Cup 2023 matches. They elected not to do so." 

While SuperSport already started the process in 2018 and acquired the rights in mid-2018 for 2023's Rugby World Cup "eMedia's case is a classic example of free-riding - seeking to profit off another's expense without contributing at all," Jury noted.


SABC got it even cheaper
Marc Jury says that "if it were not for SuperSport being willing to pay the substantial price it did for the rights, no-one in South Africa would be able to view Rugby World Cup matches at all".

"It has therefore been SuperSport who has advanced, rather than undermined or infringed, the South African public's interest in watching the matches. The SABC has also itself spent money to acquire the sublicensed Rugby World Cup matches in stark contract to eMedia which seeks to transmit those matches for free."

Marc Jury explained that the SABC got the 2023 Rugby World Cup sublicensing rights from SuperSport at R57 million at a much cheaper price than it did before.

"The amount paid by the SABC under the sublicence agreement was far below market value for the rights" he notes and says it's also "far below the amounts paid by the SABC for the 2011 and 2015 Rugby World Cup".

"SuperSport elected to accept this amount with considerable concern and at economic cost to itself but did so mindful of the SABC's financial position in order to promote the free-to-air coverage on the public broadcasting service."

"A broadcaster having a genuine interest in broadcasting valuable rights would plan well in advance of the events in question and seek, on a commercial basis, to acquire those rights on a licensing or sublicensing basis. These are steps that eMedia has simply failed to take," Jury noted.


eMedia ordered to pay legal fees
The court on Tuesday stuck the urgent application from the roll. 

"Today the Johannesburg High Court struck from the roll a case brought by eMedia against MultiChoice, SuperSport and SABC regarding the 2023 Rugby World Cup," MultiChoice says in a statement released after the hearing.

"The High Court further directed eMedia to pay the costs of MultiChoice and SuperSport, including the costs of three counsel. The effect of the High Court’s decision is that the position remains that the Springbok matches at the Rugby World Cup will continue to be broadcast only on SuperSport and the SABC," MultiChoice noted.

"The matches are not broadcast via Openview because eMedia has at no stage purchased or even attempted to purchase the rights concerned. MultiChoice and SuperSport welcome this development."

"As MultiChoice SA CEO Marc Jury explained in his affidavit before the High Court eMedia's case is a classic example of free-riding - seeking to profit off another's expense without contributing at all."


MultiChoice slams Openview over 2023 Rugby World Cup TV rights legal action: 'A classic example of free-riding'.


by Thinus Ferreira

MultiChoice is slamming eMedia's Openview as "a classic example of free-riding" after the Randburg-based pay-TV operator and the SABC have been dragged to court blocking Openview from showing 2023 Rugby World Cup matches on SuperSport and SABC2 and which Openview hasn't paid for.

After the SABC paid R57 million to sublicence 16 of the 2023 Rugby World Cup matches from SuperSport, viewers of SABC2 on Openview get filler content during matches, while viewers of the SABC2 channel carried on DStv and StarSat, as well as on SABC+ see the Rugby World Cup matches.

eMedia and Openview didn't pay for the Rugby World Cup matches and didn't license and pay for any content from the Rugby World Cup organisers.

eMedia also didn't sublicence content from SuperSport but argues that what is shown on any SABC channels should be available, and the same, anywhere, irrespective of the platform the SABC's channels are on. 

eMedia and Openview decided to take MultiChoice to court.

In its answering affidavit to eMedia's urgent application before the High Court of South Africa's Gauteng division in Johannesburg, Marc Jury, MultiChoice SA CEO, says that Openview now wants to show 2023 Rugby World Cup matches for free "at no cost to itself despite the fact that it could have participated in the process of securing a licence for those rights from World Cup Rugby directly but never did so".

"After SuperSport had acquired the licence from RWCL in Dublin, Ireland, SuperSport entered into a sublicensing agreement with the SABC to allow for Springboks and other matches to be broadcast on the SABC."

"SuperSport and the SABC agreed that the SABC could exploit the rights on its own owed and operated platforms but it would not be permitted to make available the licensed matches on any third party-owned or operated platform," Marc Jury explains.

"This meant that the SABC is not permitted to make the matches available for broadcast on third-party platforms like Openview. eMedia wants to broadcast the matches to their Openview customers without paying a cent to do so".


'Classic example of free-riding'
Marc Jury says eMedia and Openview "were well within their rights to engage in the competitive process to acquire a licence from World Rugby to broadcast the Rugby World Cup 2023 matches. They elected not to do so. 

While SuperSport already started the process in 2018 and acquired the rights in mid-2018 for 2023's Rugby World Cup "eMedia's case is a classic example of free-riding - seeking to profit off another's expense without contributing at all," Jury argues.

He says eMedia and Openview are wrong in claiming that 3.2 million TV households are unable to watch the 2023 Rugby World Cup matches.

"The viewership of the SABC channels on Openview is a far cry from the 3.2 million households with Openview set-top boxes, let alone the claimed 10 million viewers. Further, the viewership of SABC2 is smaller at a mere 61 605 and SABC Sport even smaller at 18 144 as at 31 March 2023."

Jury says that the irony is that "if eMedia's application were to succeed, it would actually result in far fewer South Africans watching the remaining matches of the Rugby World Cup 2023 than has been the case for the past Springbok games".

"That is because if, contrary to everything that has been set out above, this court were to conclude that the restriction in the sublicence with the SABC is unenforceable and invalid, then the entire sublicence between SuperSport and the SABC would fail because the restriction cannot be severed from the remainder of the sublicence."

"The result will be that there will be no free-to-air broadcast of the remaining Rugby World Cup matches."

According to Jury, "this will be a sorry day for rugby in South Africa but the result will lie squarely at the feet of eMedia".


SABC got it even cheaper
Marc Jury says that "if it were not for SuperSport being willing to pay the substantial price it did for the rights, no-one in South Africa would be able to view Rugby World Cup matches at all".

"It has therefore been SuperSport who has advanced, rather than undermined or infringed, the South African public's interest in watching the matches. The SABC has also itself spent money to acquire the sublicensed Rugby World Cup matches in stark contract to eMedia which seeks to transmit those matches for free."

Jury explains that the SABC got the 2023 Rugby World Cup sublicensing rights from SuperSport at R57 million at a much cheaper price than it did before.

"The amount paid by the SABC under the sublicence agreement was far below market value for the rights" he notes and says it's also "far below the amounts paid by the SABC for the 2011 and 2015 Rugby World Cup".

"SuperSport elected to accept this amount with considerable concern and at economic cost to itself but did so mindful of the SABC's financial position in order to promote the free-to-air coverage on the public broadcasting service."

"A broadcaster having a genuine interest in broadcasting valuable rights would plan well in advance of the events in question and seek, on a commercial basis, to acquire those rights on a licensing or sublicensing basis. These are steps that eMedia has simply failed to take," Jury notes. 

The hearing for eMedia's urgent application is scheduled for Tuesday 10 October. 


Paramount+ for South Africa: We asked, they didn't answer - but here's our guesstimates.


by Thinus Ferreira

With Paramount Global announcing that its streamer Paramount+ will launch on 1 December in Japan in partnership with a pay-TV service there, where is Paramount Africa with its plans for Paramount+ for South Africa? 

When will Paramount+, as a late-market entrant finally launch in South Africa, will it be as a so-called "hard-bundle" package tied to MultiChoice's DStv, what work has been done, and how will the content on it compete with what's already out there in terms of a Netflix or a Showmax or a Disney+ or Amazon Prime Video?

Most importantly: Will it come in below the asking price of existing streamers to entice potential consumers to give it a try when South Africans already have access to a gamut of streamers from Disney+ and MultiChoice's Showmax, to eVOD, Amazon Prime Video and Netflix? 

TVwithThinus in a media query sent these 6 questions below to Vuma Reputation Management representing Paramount Africa's corporate communications and followed up repeatedly over weeks. However, neither Vuma nor Natalie Mdladla, senior director of communications at Paramount Africa, ended up responding to the media query.

Since Vuma Reputation Management and Paramount Africa's spokesperson didn't want to directly answer any of these questions, we've put our own thinking cap on to try and answer these same questions, with our own best "guesstimate" based on what we know, and think might likely happen.


1. What work has Paramount done since February 2022 to bring Paramount+ to South Africa and Africa and what has the process been since then specifically to roll out the service here?

Paramount Africa answer: No response.
Our guess and what we know: Paramount+ and Warner Bros. Discovery's Max (previously HBO Max that also incorporates discovery+) are really the last two global streaming services, from America left to launch in South Africa. 

It looks unlikely that Peacock from NBCUniversal will launch as a separate streamer in South Africa, given that Comcast and NBCUniversal are working with MultiChoice to relaunch Showmax within months. 

Peacock content will undoubtedly be folded into whatever new platform version of Showmax is unveiled. 

There's even a chance, however weird, that Paramount+ could debut in conjunction with the relaunched Showmax, and get added as a streaming partner with MultiChoice at the same time (Netflix, Disney+ and Amazon Prime Video already have such partnership deals).   

Why the long wait for the remainders? The reasons are three-fold: Two types of money as well as resources, technical logistics and content.

Firstly the money issue: Running streamers isn't cheap. Rolling out Paramount+ will cost money, and with it still running at a loss in America, it's a given that Paramount+ will run at an operational loss (for years) in South Africa whenever it launches here. 

Like Disney and others, Paramount must crunch the numbers and decide how much money it's willing to "lose" for how long, to invest in rolling out Paramount+ in the country. Secondly, Paramount Global will be wondering how much money it will realistically be able to make in South Africa and how subscriber gains will look - the holy grail of legacy media companies transitioning to video streaming products. 

It also requires a lot of expertise and resources to roll out a streamer in a specific geographical territory - look at how Disney stumbled when India was put in charge of rolling out Disney+ in South Africa and the technical problems, bugs and litany of consumer complaints that led to.

Third is content. Paramount+ can't launch in South Africa without good or enough content. 

The content and licensing rights are often a byzantine maze to navigate and clear. Perhaps Paramount+ is clearing and clawing back rights, similar to what Disney did, and that takes time. With some content, there are existing contracts and there's nothing to do but wait for those contract to run out before content revert back to Paramount to then place it on a version of Paramount+ for South Africa. 

Paramount+ will eventually be in South Africa - it's a certainty - since video streaming is the future.
 
Paramount has however been slow and behind the curve in relation to its competition, in launching in South Africa as the continent's most sophisticated and most established TV market. It will make its incline in trying to get and grow a subscriber base even steeper than the others.


2. When is Paramount+ envisioned to launch and become available to South Africans?

Paramount Africa answer: No response.
Our guess and what we know: Quick fact: South Africa's linear primetime TV ratings are now equal to that of a country like the United Kingdom - in other words, roughly the same number of people in South Africa watch TV at night as do in the UK. 

Extrapolate from that, that roughly the same available TV audience, or video content consumers exist here as there - who are available as potential Paramount+ customers. And South African consumers do have money. Paramount+ launched in the UK in June 2022.

While we don't have any exact or confirmed date for Paramount+ to launch in South Africa, it's a case of better late than never, but also the sooner the better. 

As Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV+, Disney+ and MultiChoice's Showmax trawl to scoop up available streaming subscribers, Paramount+ as a Johnny-come-lately cannot really afford to lose much more time in launching in the country.
 

3. Paramount said it's launching Paramount+ as part of a so-called "hard bundle" in conjunction with their existing linear channels on pay-TV operators globally. Will Paramount+ launch in partnership with MultiChoice's DStv in South Africa?

Paramount Africa answer: No response.
Our guess and what we know: With metaphysical certitude, the answer is 100% yes. Paramount Africa will latch Paramount+ onto MultiChoice's traditional pay-TV service in South Africa (and maybe the rest of sub-Saharan Africa) since that's what Paramount said their strategy is in rolling out their streaming service globally.

Paramount works with existing partners in different territories, so again it will depend on when carriage agreement talks for its traditional channel bundles come up for renewal, who is the biggest (in this case MultiChoice), technology platforms and existing IT structure, as well as established relationships (which Paramount and MultiChoice City has). 

Paramount+ will eventually sit as a tile on the DStv Explora Ultra or the DStv Glass or the DStv Streama exactly like the other streamers, exactly like elsewhere in the world. 
 

4. As a late market entrant, Paramount+ will compete with the existing Netflix, Showmax, Amazon Prime Video and others. How does Paramount plan on "sweetening the pot" or entice consumers to add or sample yet another streamer? How does Paramount+ plan to differentiate itself? Also, will it try and come in below the asking price of existing streamers?

Paramount Africa answer: No response.
Our guess and what we know: When you're at a disadvantage (Paramount+ is late to the race), you need to either run faster or be smarter. Paramount Global and Paramount Africa will have to ensure extremely competitive pricing and consider extreme promotional or discount pricing, or pull some other rabbit out of the hat to start sprinting like a hare with the catch-up it needs to with the streaming distance it's behind in South Africa's video streaming wars. 

Paramount has a large library of quite enticing content - it just needs to make sure that it's all available on Paramount+. 

Halo that was/is on Showmax actually belongs on Paramount+, Paw Patrol is Paramount, and so is Star Trek, NCIS and Spongebob Squarepants, as well as the upcoming reboot of Frasier. 


5. In terms of content, how does Paramount+ see itself or position itself as different to what is available or done by other streaming services? What does Paramount+ feel that it offers content-wise (no need to mention specific shows) that is a competitive advantage over other services?

Paramount Africa answer: No response.
Our guess and what we know: There's enough on Paramount+ to make it worthwhile as a four-quadrant, family-oriented streaming service, similar to Disney+. If you like or use Disney+ in South Africa, you'll get the same type of offering but different content on Paramount+.

Like Disney+, Paramount+ (Paramount, really) has a massive amount of kids content. 

It also has a massive number of TV episodes from multiple, multiple series. Netflix on the other hand grabs attention for "buzzy" films or series (Paramount has started on that path with shows like Halo). 

As with any streamer, it will depend on what you're looking for as a consumer and whether it speaks in content to your specific needs: Do you want to keep the kids busy while you wash your hair? Are you looking for edgy, thrilling TV shows? Are you more of a film buff? Do you prefer documentaries, or foreign shows with subtitles? Do you want broad, mostly family-friendly TV dramas?


6. Why does Paramount see South Africa and Africa as a worthwhile market in which to launch Paramount+ and why does it see the market as a place where Paramount+ will have a future and will be able to scale in terms of subscribers?

Paramount Africa answer: No response.
Our guess and what we know: Again, streaming is the future. Paramount+ will supplant, in time, traditional linear pay-TV channels (yes, you BET; yes you MTV; and you Nickelodeon). 

In the way you have a satellite dish today to get a bundle of pay-TV channels into your home in South Africa - and several years of that remain - the future is digital, streaming, on-demand and live viewing of sports, news and events.

From that perspective alone, a streaming future for Paramount content in Africa is well, paramount. 

Friday, October 6, 2023

Bizarre SABC Bill calls for creation of second SABC with own commercial board approved and appointed by minster; South Africa's SABC TV Licence system set to continue.


by Thinus Ferreira

South Africa's cabinet has approved a bizarre SABC Bill which calls for the creation of a second SABC - a commercial entity complete with its own board appointed by the minister - while shockingly retaining the SABC TV Licence regime with no specifics about replacing it with a so-called household levy.

The SABC Bill approved by cabinet late last week for submission to parliament, is supposed to replace the Broadcasting Act of 1999 to help the embattled South African public broadcaster to more effectively compete and survive in today's fast-changing broadcasting and media landscape. 

Instead, the bizarre bill appears cobbled together with non-sensical language, outdated and misguided ideas for a public broadcaster and effectively spinning off the SABC's existing but troubled commercial enterprises in a whole new company with its own board, not appointed by parliament but an "independent panel" and the minister of communications.

As bizarre is the retention of the SABC TV Licence regime in the bill. 

With only 13% of TV households on the SABC's database still paying an annual TV Licence fee and with government repeatedly saying it plans to replace it with a household levy, the SABC Bill makes no mention of a household levy and instead retains the existing SABC TV Licence system.

Marked "secret" the SABC Bill calls for the creation of a second SABC - a "commercial company" as a subsidiary of the SABC, complete with its own "commercial board".

The SABC currently has commercial services in the form of radio stations and TV channels like 5FM and SABC3, but instead of these being money-spinners and making revenue to support the SABC's public service mandate, it's the public services like SABC1 and SABC2 forced to support and pay to keep SABC3 on the air.  

The plan is to move the SABC's existing but struggling commercial services into its own entity where it will presumably suddenly perform and be managed better to create revenue for the SABC.

According to the bill, this second commercial SABC will "commission a significant amount of their programming from the independent sector" and "be operated in an efficient manner so as to maximise the revenues provided" to the SABC.

While the SABC Bill was supposed to cut down on the expenses of the SABC board, it envisions the creation of a second board for the commercial SABC.

Where the public nominates, parliament oversees and interviews and the president appoints the members of the SABC board, the second SABC's board of nine additional people will be appointed by a so-called "independent selection panel consisting of five people" who then appoint this second board "in consultation with the minister", effectively sidestepping the public and parliament.


TV Licence staying put
While the SABC's current funding model is broken, with the broadcaster having made another R1.13 billion annual loss and unable to fulfill its public mandate, the SABC Bill kicks the can down the road to urgently rectify the broadcaster's funding crisis.

Instead of a replacement for the SABC TV Licence and any detailed plan for a household levy, the bill retains the SABC TV Licence system for South Africa. 

The SABC Bill states that the minister of communications, currently Mondli Gungubele, must only come up with a replacement funding model for the SABC in three year's time.

The government should "within three years after the commencement of this Act, develop a funding
model framework to ensure that the majority of the SABC's funding is sourced from the state-based funding mechanisms" the SABC Bill says.

However, "before establishing the funding model framework", the department of communications must first "develop a comprehensive and relevant feasibility study to inform a clear business case for the SABC's funding model in consultation with the minister of finance".

Monday, October 2, 2023

Below Deck's Kyle Viljoen shares rare disease emergency: 'Pain like none other'.


by Thinus Ferreira

Below Deck Mediterranean's Kyle Viljoen is recovering after a serious health scare and sharing that he just went through the "most painful and traumatic bodily experience" ever.

On Sunday on Instagram, the South African reality star - one of several South Africans who feature as interior and deck crew across various seasons in the Bravo series franchise seen on E! (DStv 124) - said that after he was initially misdiagnosed, he was eventually diagnosed with the rare Stevens-Johnson syndrome and ended up in hospital.

"Monday started with throat pain like none other," he says, which "spread to my mouth, lips, hands and feet. Having gone to the walk-in clinic and diagnosed with hand-foot-mouth disease they sent me on my way. Wednesday to Thursday I suffered from worsening blisters, inability to tolerate swallowing, tongue swelling and a change in vision."

"Friday there was still no relief." He says his fiance Zachary rushed him to New York University hospital's emergency room.

"Bypassing others in the ED waiting room, the medical staff rushed me in to be examined from head to toe by almost every service from ophthalmology to dermatology (over 20 doctors) and told me I had something called SJS. Stevens-Johnson Syndrome is a rare, serious disorder of the skin and mucous membranes." 

Kyle says he has finally "eaten my first meal in seven days", saying people should advocate for their own health "and treat your body seriously. If something doesn't feel right, seek treatment".

Kyle Viljoen first appeared in the 7th season of Below Deck Mediterranean and is back in season 8 which just started in the United States. 

Tumi Mhlongo from South Africa who appeared in Below Deck Down Under's first season is also back for her second season in Below Deck Med's 8th season, working with Kyle.

e.tv takes SuperSport to court over SABC's sublicensed Rugby World Cup TV rights.


by Thinus Ferreira

A court scrum is coming with eMedia Holdings, parent company of e.tv, which is taking SuperSport to court over the inability of its Openview service to show the 2023 Rugby World Cup free on its satellite TV service, after the SABC acquired the sublicensing rights for R57 million.

While MultiChoice and SuperSport years ago acquired the licensing rights for the current 2023 Rugby World shown on SuperSport channels to DStv subscribers, the SABC - with days to spare - last month paid R57 million to SuperSport to acquire the sublicensing rights to show 16 matches of the 48 matches on its SABC TV channels.

While MultiChoice and SuperSport have its own Rugby World Cup sponsors, the SABC - which made another annual loss of R1.13 billion and doesn't have money to pay for the rights - managed to cobble together its own sponsors at short notice like South African Breweries (SAB), Hollywoodbets and insurer Pineapple, to pony up the R57 million to sublicence the sports rights.

The SABC TV channels which are available freely, are also carried on the satellite TV services of MultiChoice's DStv, StarTimes Media SA's StarSat, as well as eMedia's Openview.

The issue is this: MultiChoice is preventing the SABC from showing the Rugby World Cup matches it had acquired from SuperSport, on the versions of the SABC's TV channels carried on Openview.

While SABC2 on DStv will, for instance, show the Rugby World Cup match between the Springboks and Tonga, the SABC is forced to substitute it with other filler programming for the version of SABC2 shown on Openview, since Openview is a direct competitor to MultiChoice.

MultiChoice argues that it doesn't want content that it had to bid and pay for to be available for free - especially not on a competing satellite TV service. 

eMedia argues that the SABC is a public broadcaster and that content on its TV channels should be the same everywhere and be accessible as widely as possible and to all South Africans irrespective of the distribution platform.

After threatening to do so in two acrimonious letters sent last month to MultiChoice that eMedia also made public and gave to the media, eMedia has now lodged papers in the high court and has announced its decision to sue MultiChoice and SuperSport.

eMedia paid for three expensive black-and-white full-page ads in the Sunday Times, Rapport and City Press newspapers respectively. 

In the form of a poem, eMedia in the full-page ad published in Sunday, states that "The court is engaged, the court will decide if digitally migrated Openview homes will get to the Rugby World Cup. The court will decide if Openview homes, who must pay TV licences, get to see the Rugby World Cup on SABC2".

Khalik Sherrif, eMedia CEO, in a statement said "The anticompetitive action is nothing short of domination in trying to prescribe to the free-to-air partner on how to use its broadcasting rights".

"We believe the action should be strongly condemned and opposed. The 3.2 million households which have been affected by the decision should voice their dissatisfaction."

MultiChoice told TVwithThinus in a statement "We are in receipt of the application served on us by eMedia. We consider the application to be without merit and have notified eMedia of our intention to oppose it".


Satellite TV cold war
The frosty relationship between the Hyde Park-based eMedia and the Randburg-based MultiChoice steadily soured over the past decade as it steadily built to an all-out TV war.

The relationship between eMedia and MultiChoice frayed due to eMedia's own growing multi-channel content aspirations which led to its creation of Openview, as well as increasingly contentious channel carriage renewal deals for the eNCA (DStv 403) TV news channel and later other e.tv-packaged TV channels offered to DStv.

In a drawn-out case at the Competition Commission, e.tv's additional TV channels remain available on MultiChoice's DStv which the pay-TV operator wanted to axe at the end of March 2022.

MultiChoice wanted to get rid of eMedia's eMovies (DStv 138), eMovies Extra (DStv 140), eExtra (DStv 195) and eToonz (DStv 311) TV channels but in August the Competition Appeal Court granted yet another extension for e.tv's channels to remain on DStv for the time being.

MultiChoice was again ordered to keep the four TV channels on DStv until the conclusion of the Competition Tribunal's latest decision on case.

MultiChoice shutters Showmax Pro.


by Thinus Ferreira

MultiChoice is shuttering its upsell Showmax Pro offering bundled with sports content after three years, in order to make way for its new tiered Showmax service with Comcast's NBCUniversal that it plans to launch within months, with a new subscription fee structure.

Laura Cooke, Showmax spokesperson, confirmed to TVwithThinus that Showmax Pro, launched just over three years ago in July 2020, is no longer available and that Showmax Pro subscribers are moved to other services.

MultiChoice, in partnership with Comcast's NBCUniversal and Sky in the United Kingdom, will relaunch a retooled Showmax in its attempt to better compete against the existing and growing collection of video streaming services available in South Africa and across the African continent - most notably Netflix which has the biggest market share of subscribers across the continent.

Since 1 October Showmax Pro at a cost of R349 per month is no longer accepting new subscriptions since the sports offering of "Showmax 2.0" at its relaunch will carry the English Premier League (EPL) and other sports content folded into the streamer's enhanced offering.

Existing Showmax Pro subscribers in South Africa are offered DStv Compact Plus Stream at the same price as Showmax Pro, while subscribers elsewhere on the African continent are offered a DStv Stream subscription at the same price as Showmax Pro. 

The alternative make-good offers are not available to Showmax Pro mobile subscribers.