SABC chairperson Bongumusa Makhathini says South African funding bodies focused on financing film should consolidate and give more cash to TV producers for television content.

The SABC that struggles to pay independent production companies and owes producers millions of rands in outstanding fees on Thursday said existing content funding bodies in South Africa should focus less on financing local films and put a bigger emphasis on giving cash to TV producers.

Bongumusa Makhathini, SABC chairperson, who spoke at the Public Broadcasting Colloquium held at the Gallagher Convention Centre, said funding organisations should be consolidated and that more money should be given to independent television producers since most money is going to film production.

The SABC itself owes multiple production companies millions of rands over months and just recorded another annual loss of R622 million, with the public broadcaster's biggest show, Uzalo on SABC1 that just resumed production after it shut down completely for a week due to the SABC's non-payment of producers.

"The SABC believes that there should be a focus on how the existing content funding bodies and mechanisms can be consolidated, strengthened and better resourced in South Africa,"said Bongumusa Makhathini.

"Most of these public funds have been disbursed for feature film production. By providing more funding for independent television producers, content funding bodies will not only share the obligation with the SABC and other broadcasters but will ensure that producers are able to retain a
greater share of the rights, post-initial broadcast."

He said that "the only way to remain relevant and retain large audiences is for the SABC to continue to focus on making excellent television and radio content".

Bongumusa Makhathini.again repeated that the SABC wants to be paid by pay-TV operators like MultiChoice and StarTimes South Africa's StarSat for SABC1, SABC2 and SABC3 that these operators are forced to carry under the broadcasting regulator's so-called "must-carry" rules.

He said the "fees that the SABC should be receiving from other broadcasters for SABC1, SACB2 and SABC3 must become part of a more significant commercial revenue stream for the public broadcaster".

Just like the SABC in South Africa, broadcaster ITV in Britain now wants payment to be carried on satellite TV platforms as its ITV1 channel could go dark on Virgin over a £80 million re-transmission payment battle.

The free-to-air TV channel ITV in Britain could start to disappear from the channel line-up of satellite pay-TV operators like Virgin and Sky in the United Kingdom in a case akin to South Africa's public broadcaster that recently said it now wants money for its TV channels being carried on pay-TV operators' platforms.

The SABC's SABC1, SABC2 and SABC3 channels, as well as e.tv's primary channel are currently carried for free on MultiChoice's DStv, StarSat, and eMedia Investment's OpenView HD under so-called "must-carry regulations".

Satellite TV operators are forced to carry these channels in order to promote access and accessibility of the content to the public, while the channels enjoy the bigger viewership across bigger viewing platforms it would not otherwise have - especially in large geographical areas where there's no coverage of the channels' signals.

The SABC in November 2017 said it now wants satellite TV operators to pay for its channels, with MultiChoice that responded and said the SABC's financial problems has nothing to do with MultiChoice, slammed the SABC as "opportunistic" and said that it's the SABC that will lose out if its channels are removed from platforms like DStv.

In the United Kingdom, ITV has now started to threaten to take its ITV1 channel away from Virgin's pay-TV offering unless Virgin pays it £80 million. Virgin already pays for other channels from ITV, like ITV2, in the way that MultiChoice pays the SABC for the additional SABC channels like SABC News and SABC Encore.

ITV is the same company that supplies the ITV Choice (DStv 123) pay-TV channel to MultiChoice's DStv platform in South Africa and elsewhere in Africa, with shows like Dancing on Ice, Victoria and The Voice UK.

ITV and Virgin have been locked in a stand-off for months now after ITV got the right to now charge for operators to carry ITV1, after a change to British legislation and the introduction of a new Digital Economy Act in April 2017.

Before the change in legislation, pay-TV operators got ITV1 for free.

Virgin in a statement says it won't be paying ITV for the ITV1 channel to be on its line-up and that it doesn't see why it should, saying if ITV should remove ITV1 it will be "mutual self-destruction".

"Our customers will not pay for a service that is available for free and we see no reason why they should," says David Bouchier, chief digital entertainment officer at Virgin Media.

"The position was very clear. How ITV is funded has been the same since it was created – and to come and pick us off individually is not an appropriate way to do it. The government has also been clear that there are benefits on both sides to re-transmission, so for ITV to do something like that, I cannot see the logic, it is counter-intuitive."

"We are the second-biggest TV platform in the United Kingdom and that makes us an important partner. What is important is positive engagement, rather than this position of mutual self-destruction. I’m confident logic will prevail."

ITV in a statement says "ITV, and other public service broadcasters, should be paid fairly by pay-TV platforms that make money from our multi-billion-pound investment in original UK content. A change in the law now allows us to negotiate with Virgin for payment for our main channel, and that is what we are attempting to do."